But confusion remains after the institute admitted some firms had registered with both the ICAEW and the FSA.
Talking at a meeting organised by the Small Practitioners Association, the institute’s head of regulatory policy, Peter Burton, said some firms had signed up with both the ICAEW and FSA, and others had opted to go with the wrong one.
However, Burton said that, following discussions with the FSA, these firms had been steered towards a more appropriate option.
According to the FSA, nearly one thousand accountancy firms had signed up for full regulation under the authority, which assumed full powers last weekend.
The ICAEW said 3,100 of its member firms had opted to be licensed by the institute, 550 had gone with the FSA and another 550 had dropped out altogether.
ACCA said so far only 100 of its firms had opted in to being monitored by the association, but that it had assumed all firms with existing authorisation would be licensed under the new system.
Before ‘N2’, the date when the FSA took over regulating investment advice, ACCA had monitored 4,500 firms.
Making Tax Digital will impose significant additional tax compliance costs on small businesses for little or no medium term benefit, tax and small business experts told MPs
MHA MacIntyre Hudson has partnered with cloud accounting software provider Xero ahead of the government’s requirement for digital records
The drive towards a fully digital tax regime is an admirable one, but mandation is simply wrong, according to one of the UK's most senior tax technology practitioners - Paul Aplin
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...