If a private study into unreported accounting anomalies confirms many more companies ‘are getting away with it’, the Financial Reporting Review Panel’s ‘shoe-string operation’ could become an investigative agency aimed at exposing companies that ‘fiddle’ their accounts.
An announcement is expected in May, but Sir Richard Sykes, the panel’s chairman, said proposals to extend existing powers would undergo ‘serious consideration’.
Sir Richard expressed concern over the sluggish process of inquiries in the Financial Reporting Council’s 2000 annual review. But, the panel has little power to speed up the process.
He told Accountancy Age: ‘We are at the mercy of companies to whom we write. It is relatively easy to delay the procedure.’
Delays are compounded through unanswered letters from the panel and slow internal investigation processes.
So far, if a company chooses not to co-operate, the panel has not shied away from using its only power – to refer a matter to court.
The panel currently investigates companies reactively through the receipt of anonymous letters, company reporting publications and media reports.
The proposed changes would see it go on a proactive footing.
The Panel was set up in June 1991 as the enforcement body for the Accounting Standards Board.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel