Corporates win moral victory in tax battle

Corporates win moral victory in tax battle

Appeal court rules that subsidiaries of European parents were victims of dividend tax discrimination

Multinationals challenging historic rules on dividend taxation won a moral
victory this week in their battle to have millions of tax repaid.

The Court of Appeal ruled that advanced corporation tax rules discriminated
against companies with foreign parents.

The tax was paid on dividends, and companies could elect to pay it either
when they paid a UK parent, or later when the parents themselves paid a
dividend.

The option was not open to foreign subsidiaries, with companies from Gallaher
to NEC Semiconductors challenging that the rules created a cashflow disadvantage
for them.

The Court of Appeal ruled that they were suffering a disadvantage, but added
that the rules meant the UK had not in fact incorporated relevant treaties so as
to include the advanced corporation tax.

The problem means that companies will not get the repayments unless the House
of Lords rules otherwise on appeal, or a separate argument goes the
multinationals way.

European rules stipulate that there should be no hindrance to the movement of
capital into and outside of the EU, unless rules that do hinder movement were in
place before 1994.

The question as to how those rules apply in the case is likely to go to the
European Court of Justice.

Chris Morgan, head of the EU tax group at KPMG, said: ‘The court of appeal
has said this is a point that ought to be decided by the ECJ, and that if they
were the final court they would refer it.’

Morgan added that if the case was successful on the second point, there would
be a likelihood of further litigation from those paying dividends into the UK
that were taxed.

The case, known as ACT class 3, is itself likely to go to the House of Lords
to decide the issues under UK law before an ECJ reference is sought.

It is not known exactly how much is at stake in the case. ACT paid could be
offset against other tax liabilities, meaning the issue revolves in some cases
purely around cashflow issues. NEC itself had a £6m liability that could not be
offset. There are around 50 cases in the class.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often overlooked, always essential
AP

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often overlooked, always essentia...

1m Kloo

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often ov...

Embracing user-friendly AP systems can turn the tide, streamlining workflows, enhancing compliance, and opening doors to early payment discounts. Read...

View article
The power of customisation in accounting systems
Accounting Software

The power of customisation in accounting systems

2m Kloo

The power of customisation in accounting systems

Organisations can enhance their financial operations' efficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness by adopting platforms that offer them self-service cust...

View article
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts payable efficiency
AP

8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts payable efficiency

2m Kloo

8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts paya...

Discover how AP dashboards can transform your business by enhancing efficiency and accuracy in tracking key metrics, as revealed by the latest insight...

View article