Peter Mitchell – Trial and error at the Revenue

Peter Mitchell - Trial and error at the Revenue

So the 31 January self-assessment deadline is past. What a trial this process has proved; filling out the returns needed a great deal of understanding, while the software took an age to obtain – to say nothing of agreeing the tax calculations and statements that followed.

The Inland Revenue seems unable to cope with the returns submitted, and many districts are reportedly several months behind. Clearly, many clients won’t know the agreed level of their 1996/1997 tax payments until March 1998 or even later, despite weekend working and all other work sidelined.

The reality of ‘slow’ filing is surely the added effort required. Colleagues report average completion time has extended from 30 minutes to at least one and a half hours.

How insensitive of the Revenue to panic clients with final reminders when returns were filed after 30 September. Why weren’t these logged as received? Additional effort was wasted contacting districts and reassuring clients.

It is hard to believe, given the number of enquiries or processing problems identified outside and within the Revenue, that this system was satisfactorily tested before launch. A further trial year was required before foisting it on an unsuspecting public. Hopefully, an internal Revenue investigation will pinpoint who was responsible for this indecent haste.

The sole beneficiary of this ‘fairer’ system appears to be the government in accelerating collection of tax; accountants are putting in greater effort – so clients will suffer an unwelcome increase in charges. I calculate that allowing for an additional hour at #70 for five million taxpayers plus training and software for 30,000 practices at, say #500, the total bill could come to #500m.

Despite the blood, sweat and tears shed by those stretched to the limit to comply, late filing of returns has occurred; hopefully, the Revenue can find it in its heart not to automatically impose #100 fines.

Clearly, this ‘make work’ solution to government policy must be streamlined and simplified for the 1997/1998 tax year and those after. This must not be the end. Peter Mitchell is chairman of the Small Practitioners’ Association

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often overlooked, always essential
AP

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often overlooked, always essentia...

2m Kloo

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often ov...

Embracing user-friendly AP systems can turn the tide, streamlining workflows, enhancing compliance, and opening doors to early payment discounts. Read...

View article
The power of customisation in accounting systems
Accounting Software

The power of customisation in accounting systems

2m Kloo

The power of customisation in accounting systems

Organisations can enhance their financial operations' efficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness by adopting platforms that offer them self-service cust...

View article
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y Accountancy Age

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts payable efficiency
AP

8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts payable efficiency

2m Kloo

8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts paya...

Discover how AP dashboards can transform your business by enhancing efficiency and accuracy in tracking key metrics, as revealed by the latest insight...

View article