Coopers paid £65m in Barings case

Coopers paid £65m in Barings case

It has been revealed that Coopers & Lybrand, now part of Big Four firm PricewaterhouseCoopers, paid out £65m in settlement for its part in the scandal surrounding Barings Bank.

Link: Barings: Deloitte acted negligently

The amount of the settlement, reached in late 2001, was revealed in the judgement of Justice Evans Lombe in relation to the case between Barings and Deloitte & Touche.

Coopers & Lybrand had been due to face High Court action for its role in the bank’s collapse. Barings claimed the firm’s audits did not identify the dangers posed by the unauthorised transactions of rogue trader Nick Leeson.

Barings Futures (Singapore) had claimed for the amount of losses suffered as a result of Leeson’s trading in February 1995 with other parts of the group also putting in substantial claims in relation to Coopers’ 1994 audit of the bank.Last week, rival Big Four firm Deloitte & Touche was found negligent for its part in the Barings collapse by the High Court. Justice Evans-Lombe found that Deloitte Singapore was liable in its audit work for Barings Futures in Singapore for the years 1992 and 1993.

The amount of damages that the firm will have to pay in connection with this judgement has not yet been decided, but will be determined in due course according to KPMG, the Barings Group liquidator.

Although a substantial amount, the Coopers & Lybrand settlement has raised doubts among some in the industry over whether the current drive to establish a liability cap for accountancy firms is necessary. An amount of £65m is unlikely to cause major damage to any of the Big Four.

Coopers & Lybrand has also suffered at the hands of the Joint Disciplinary Scheme, which found that the firm’s belief that Leeson’s activities ‘posed little (or no) risk to the Barings Group, but yielded vary good returns’ was implausible and ‘demonstrates a degree of ignorance of market reality that totally lacks credibility’.

The firm was fined £250,000 while Coopers partner Gareth Maldwyn Davies was fined £25,000.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata
Professional Services

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folders and Embrace Metadata

3y

Why Professional Services Firms Should Ditch Folde...

In the past decade, the professional services industry has transformed significantly. Digital disruptions, increased competition, and changing market ...

View resource
2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professional Services Firms

3y

2 Vital keys to Remaining Competitive for Professi...

In recent months, professional services firms are facing more pressure than ever to deliver value to clients. Often, clients look at the firms own inf...

View resource
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021
Making Tax Digital

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

3y

Digital Links: A guide to MTD in 2021

The first phase of Making Tax Digital (MTD) saw the requirement for the digital submission of the VAT Return using compliant software. That’s now behi...

View resource