The taxman will not be objective in deciding whether taxpayers’ behaviour is
reasonable if they have not padi the right tax, warns
Responding to HM Revenue &
Customs’ plan for a single penalty regime for underpayment or
non-payment of taxes, ICAS warned that the legislation introduces concepts of
what behaviour is reasonable without defining what is expected of taxpayers.
As the ultimate arbiter in any dispute, the tax inspector will always have a
‘less than objective opinion’ in any tax dispute, the institute stated.
Under the plans, employers would also be penalised for unpaid tax, despite
the employees dodging payments.
The institute wants HMRC to strengthen taxpayers’ safeguards, reconsider
proposals to impose penalties where there has not been a loss of tax, and look
again at penalising employers for employees’ misdemeanors.
‘We are concerned that the legislation introduces new concepts about what
behaviour is reasonable and fails to define adequately what the State expects a
taxpayer to do to achieve the standard of reasonable care,’ said ICAS’ Bob
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy