Bankers, construction industry leaders, accountants and government insiders have expressed dismay at the ASB’s attempt to clarify accounting for private finance initiative (PFI).
The ASB’s amendment to FRS 5, which was published last month, seeks to determine where liabilities lie for PFI projects such as roads, prisons and hospitals, and to show them on the relevant organisation’s balance sheet.
But those opposing the amendment fear that the proposals would shift the vast majority of schemes onto the public-sector balance sheet, which is exactly what PFI was designed to avoid.
Construction industry leaders such as James Armstrong, finance director of John Laing, have already spoken out against the amendment. Tim Stone, head of PFI at KPMG, has warned that the proposals have ‘the potential to scupper PFI’. Insiders in government departments said that the proposals were unacceptable and ‘would not be adopted’.
The British Bankers Association is consulting its members over a response to the amendment. The BBA said it did not want to pre-empt its members’ responses. A spokesman said: ‘We usually welcome clarification of these issues, but it is important to look at the implications of this.’
The second largest improvement in ‘significant’ levels of financial distress since the EU Referendum was in professional services, found research from Begbies Traynor
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.