Chancellor Gordon Brown was expected to engage in a rare relaxation of traditional ‘Budget purdah’ yesterday by despatching senior officials to the Commons Social Security Committee to explain the technical difficulties of taxing child benefit.
It was seen as a signal that he intends to tax child benefit as if it were received by fathers, though this could be delayed for a year and funded by phasing out the married persons’ allowance or MIRAS.
Brown insisted the committee, which is preparing a report on child benefit, promise to restrict itself to questions on the practicalities.
MPs are expected to oppose the proposition that the highest earner in a household, if paying income tax at the higher rate, is forced to include child benefit in his/her earnings. There are fears that this would embroil the Inland Revenue in issues of cohabitation and paternity that hit the Child Support Agency.
Penalising higher-rate mothers alone would raise #70m, funding an increase of just 10p a week to the benefit. Retaining independent taxation and taxing fathers could raise #450m, adding 70p a week.
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy