With such a high profile in Y2K consultancy, and a limited time to implement and test millennium compliance programmes, the firm decided to concentrate its efforts on a limited number of longer term clients. The decision comes amid concerns that Big Five consultancy firms could find themselves liable for failing to complete Y2K projects.
Paul North, an associate partner at Andersen Consulting said: ‘It’s pragmatic thinking because we can only do work for so many clients. All the consultancy firms have more Y2K work than they can handle.’ He denied that the decision to minimise fresh projects was due to litigation fears: ‘Any project has the potential for litigation, but its not the driving force behind the directive. Any project needs sensible guidelines,’ he said.
Ian Hugo, assistant director of independent Y2K watch-dog Taskforce 2000, said the announcement would not lose Consulting money.
‘Consulting’s large existing clients are likely to need more resources for testing their systems are millennium-compliant in the future,’ he said.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel