TaxPersonal TaxBuilders’ tax fury

Builders' tax fury

Inland Revenue is accused of speeding up taxation changes to the construction industry. Phillip Inman reports.

Small building firms have accused the Inland Revenue of imposing a nightmare tax classification switch that will lead to a massive rise in red tape and bureaucracy across the construction industry.

The industry is also angry that Revenue officers have already begun to impose the tax switch in some regions, breaching an agreement that the new rules would not be introduced until August 1999.

The switch is set to strip thousands of building firms of the 714C certificates that guarantee their right to accept gross payments. Only the largest companies, such as John Laing and Tarmac, are likely to retain these certificates.

Other companies that fail the tests will be offered a 714P certificate.

Under the 714P rules, building firms will have to undergo a series of security checks before they can be paid gross for building work.

Small building companies which act as sub-contractors will be hardest hit. Currently, they can fax details of their tax status to a main contractor. This allows them to accept gross payments.

But under the new scheme, they will need to travel to the office of the main contractor with a photocard to prove both the existence of the company and that they are allowed to calculate their own tax.

Before Christmas, two leading trade bodies met the Revenue to contest the move. Brian Flint, deputy director of the Federation of Master Builders, a critic in the past of the Revenue’s crackdown on self-employed building workers, refused to confirm that representations had been made to the Revenue or to comment on the current situation.

But industry sources said that the discussions between the two sides, which include the National Federation of Builders, are ongoing.

Alistair Kendrick, senior tax manager at KPMG, said the switch would cause building companies massive upheaval. ‘If companies work outside their local area they will find life very difficult.

I think any company told that they must have a ‘P’ certificate should contest it with the Revenue,’ he said.

The Revenue denied that officers were imposing the rules before the 1999 deadline.

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

1d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter