Builders’ tax fury

Builders' tax fury

Inland Revenue is accused of speeding up taxation changes to the construction industry. Phillip Inman reports.

Small building firms have accused the Inland Revenue of imposing a nightmare tax classification switch that will lead to a massive rise in red tape and bureaucracy across the construction industry.

The industry is also angry that Revenue officers have already begun to impose the tax switch in some regions, breaching an agreement that the new rules would not be introduced until August 1999.

The switch is set to strip thousands of building firms of the 714C certificates that guarantee their right to accept gross payments. Only the largest companies, such as John Laing and Tarmac, are likely to retain these certificates.

Other companies that fail the tests will be offered a 714P certificate.

Under the 714P rules, building firms will have to undergo a series of security checks before they can be paid gross for building work.

Small building companies which act as sub-contractors will be hardest hit. Currently, they can fax details of their tax status to a main contractor. This allows them to accept gross payments.

But under the new scheme, they will need to travel to the office of the main contractor with a photocard to prove both the existence of the company and that they are allowed to calculate their own tax.

Before Christmas, two leading trade bodies met the Revenue to contest the move. Brian Flint, deputy director of the Federation of Master Builders, a critic in the past of the Revenue’s crackdown on self-employed building workers, refused to confirm that representations had been made to the Revenue or to comment on the current situation.

But industry sources said that the discussions between the two sides, which include the National Federation of Builders, are ongoing.

Alistair Kendrick, senior tax manager at KPMG, said the switch would cause building companies massive upheaval. ‘If companies work outside their local area they will find life very difficult.

I think any company told that they must have a ‘P’ certificate should contest it with the Revenue,’ he said.

The Revenue denied that officers were imposing the rules before the 1999 deadline.

Related Articles

Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

Legal Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

4m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

7m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

9m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer