Moves by trade secretary Stephen Byers to force executives’ pay deals to be put to an annual shareholder vote and be independently audited have been slammed by accountants and other financial experts.
‘Shareholders are the wrong people to judge remuneration as they don’t have the expertise or the interest,’ said Moira Conoley, a senior PricewaterhouseCoopers partner. ‘Remuneration committees have been established to carry out the role of controlling pay rises. The answer is therefore to review the role of these committees,’ she said.
Byers has said he will monitor forthcoming annual meetings for evidence of a more responsible approach from companies and shareholders, and that legislation to enforce annual votes on remuneration was a possibility.
Peter Butler, corporate focus director of Hermes, the UK’s largest pension fund, said if pay decisions were put to a shareholder vote, independent auditors should be involved.
‘If non-executive directors think a pay deal is reasonable but shareholders do not, an independent third party is needed to assemble the reasons why,’ he said.
Conoley said even auditors would not mitigate the proposals. ‘This would be a recipe for disaster,’ she said. ‘The only way forward is through the remuneration committee.’
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel