The reassurance comes after a judge ruled that a company director could not assume that his auditor bears a ‘commercial responsibility’ to the business.
Court action followed after City firm Alliotts started proceedings against Howglen, the outdoor adventure specialist, for unpaid fees amounting to £66,000. This followed the disclosure in 1995 that the business had made a £50,000 loss.
Howglen counter claimed that Alliotts was negligent in the preparation of the accounts.
The outdoor specialist also claimed Alliotts’ partner Andre Damyon was a quasi-financial director of the company and therefore owed a duty of care to provide commercial advice.
The judge, Mr Justice Morrell, ruled that Alliotts was not negligent in preparing the accounts and that a commercial duty of care was not owed.
Pradeep Dandiker, partner at law firm Davies Arnold Cooper, which represented Alliotts, said: ‘It’s very good news for accountants. It?s good to have this clarification from the court.’
He said that it meant businesses could not assume their advisers were holding their hands through every financial decision that they took.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel