An overwhelming majority, more than eight in ten, of small practices believe any review system should not be made compulsory and such a scheme would not improve public confidence in general practitioners.
According to the survey by the Small Practitioners Association of practices with up to five partners, only 12% believed the review system, provisionally called ‘Practice Assurance’ would be relevant to general practitioners.
But the SPA’s chairman, Peter Mitchell, accepted some form of review would be inevitable. ‘Other institutes have a review system, but the question of the form and method of the review needs to be answered.’
Last December, the ICAEW council agreed the go-ahead in principle for the practice assurance scheme, which would include a compulsory review of all areas of client work.
Detailed proposals are due to be debated by an informal meeting of the institute’s council in September, but the scheme will need to be approved by all ICAEW members at a special general meeting in June next year.
John Edwards, head of practice assurance at the ICAEW, said the institute’s own surveys had shown 60% were adopting a ‘wait and see’ approach to the scheme. He said: ‘It’s not a done deal, we have been around the country carrying out briefing sessions with district societies to say what our current thinking is.’
A new head of solutions, Aidan Brennan, has been appointed at KPMG UK
Hundreds of jobs are secure after Spectrum Contracting has been sold out of administration to Minstrell Recruitment by FRP Advisory
Cowgill Holloway and Warings Business Advisors have merged, with a range of growth plans in the North West put in place
The Practitioner discusses their timesheet militancy, and reaction to someone playing it fast and loose with the details...