Almost three-quarters of the UK’s finance directors believe all accountancy firms should produce a full set of annual accounts.
This week’s Big Question survey, carried out by Accountancy Age and Reed Accountancy Personnel, found that 53% of FDs thought annual accounts should definitely be produced, while 20% thought they probably should.
‘It is only right that those people who are the checkers are in a position where they can be checked,’ said Ricky Barrow, FD of plant hire and sale company Beaver 84.
His comments were echoed by David Vezey of the Institute of Advanced Motorists. ‘All accountants should be open to scrutiny, like everything else within business,’ he said.
Only 11% of FDs thought firms, which will have to produce plc-style annual reports if they opt for limited liability partnership status when it become available, should not be forced to produce their accounts annually.
Of those finance directors who favoured secrecy, typical comments were that as partnerships, accountancy firms should not be required to report.
‘Accounts are private and should not have to be divulged to all and sundry,’ one FD, who wished to remain anonymous, said.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel