PracticeAccounting FirmsDeloitte responds to JDS complaints

Deloitte responds to JDS complaints

Big Four firm claims that Joint Disciplinary tribunal will not uphold today's complaints

Deloitte has responded to today’s JDS complaints against the firm and its chairman, Martin Scicluna, and claimed that an independent tribunal hearing ‘will not uphold the complaints’.

Link: Scicluna worried for reputation

The complaints were issued by Chris Dickson, executive counsel of the JDS, this morning after a High Court ruling lifted a temporary injunction which was preventing their publication. The complaints were based on matters relating to work carried out on the audit of casino company, Capital Corporation.

‘After a five-year JDS investigation, no complaint has been laid in respect of the audits of the financial statements of Capital Corporation,’ a Deloitte statement said. ‘We therefore objected to having unsubstantiated and groundless allegations aired in public before even the commencement of the tribunal process.’

Martin Scicluna, the UK chairman of the board of partners, has had a complaint laid against him by Dickson for ‘failing to report’ Stephen Ives, a former Deloitte audit partner who worked on the Capital account, to the ICAEW. He has also laid complaints against the firm itself, which will now be investigated by an independent tribunal.

Ives was excluded from membership of the ICAEW and ordered to pay £87,000 costs by the JDS last November for ‘fraud’. The JDS found Ives had ‘fraudulently obtained’ a Range Rover from Capital Corporation, which owned the famous high-rolling Mayfair casino Crockfords. Capital was sold to Stanley Leisure in 1999 following a protracted bidding battle.

Along with the complaint against Scicluna, a separate complaint has been laid against Deloitte as a firm for ‘failing to resign as auditor of Capital’ at the time of Capital’s 1996 interim announcement.

In a third complaint laid down by the JDS and to be investigated by the independent tribunal, Deloitte was charged with ‘acquiescing in Capital’s misleading amendments to the disclosures D&T had recommended that Capital make to the market’.

‘In respect of Capital’s 1996 interim announcement, we reject totally the statement that the announcement included misleading statements. It would have been inappropriate to resign as auditors, and our decision to continue was consistent with Auditing Standards,’ the statement said.

‘The firm carried out a thorough review of the position of Stephen Edward Ives, did conclude he should retire from the firm, but based upon information available at that time, did not conclude that it was appropriate to report Ives to the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales,’ said Deloitte.

Related Articles

Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

Accounting Firms Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

3w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

Accounting Firms British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

Accounting Firms Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

1m Lewis Silkin
RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

Accounting Firms RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
RSM announces 11 partner promotions

Accounting Firms RSM announces 11 partner promotions

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

Accounting Firms BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

Accounting Firms What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

2m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
EY, Deloitte lead Big Four in gender pay gap reporting

Accounting Firms EY, Deloitte lead Big Four in gender pay gap reporting

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor