TaxCorporate TaxFD liability legislation is ‘disproportionate’

FD liability legislation is 'disproportionate'

New liability rules that requires chief accounting officers in large companies to monitor accounting systems and report any problems to HMRC is considered heavy-handed and inconsistent

New legislation that could see fines imposed on finance directors at
companies with sloppy procedures for calculating tax returns is heavy-handed and
inconsistent, tax experts claimed this week.

The liability rule, which was announced in last week’s Budget and will be
introduced in the next Finance Bill, will require chief accounting officers in
companies with a turnover of more than £22.8m and with more than 250 employees,
to monitor accounting systems and report any problems to HM Revenue &
Customs.

FDs who fail to do so will have to pay a personal penalty of up to £5,000,
the government has said. HMRC said the rule, which it hopes will create an
additional £140m in tax receipts over four years, could be extended if it proves
effective.

Robert Wilde, FD at Regal Petroleum, the oil and gas exploration company,
said: ‘The inference made in the plans Darling has announced is that by making
this a personal liability on one director, then more attention will be paid to
the matter, when in reality we treat all tax filings with absolute respect. I
would not want other board members, whether here or in any other company, to be
allowed under legislation to shirk their collective responsibility.’

‘Would this then mean that the quid pro quo is that I could say that most of
HSE [Health and Safety Executive regulations] do not relate to me because the
biggest HSE risks lie in the drilling of gas wells and this is not financial?
No, it does not and nor should it be.’

Frank Haskew, head of the tax faculty at the ICAEW, told
Accountancy Age TV the proposal was
‘disproportionate’ and was like ‘using a hammer to crack a nut.’

He questioned why the new law only applied applied to large companies. ‘I
would have thought internal controls [within the accounts department] are just
as important for small companies,’ he said. ‘This government loves bureaucracy
and here is yet another example of it.’

Barry Murphy, tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said it may not always
be clear who is a chief accounting officer within a company.

Law firm Brewin Leighton Paister said the FD liability rule could damage the
UK’s reputation as a financial centre.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson