Alistair Darling held a meeting with Mary Keegan, chairman of the ASB, and Allan Cook, technical director, last week to discuss the impact of FRS 17, due to take full effect in 2003, and IAS 19 with which listed companies must comply by 2005.
Darling told the BBC’s On the Record: ‘I had the Accounting Standards Board in to see me and I made the point that the standard we have in the UK is different from the international accounting board standard. They’re thinking about that.’
The ASB has however been very aware of the differences between the two standards following a ruling by the European Commission endorsing international accounting rules.
UK plc, together with all other European listed companies, must adopt IASs in 2005, but they are also having to contend with radical changes to UK accounting standards in the meantime.
Allan Cook told Accountancy Age.com: ‘We’ve been saying this for 12 months and explaining the differences between the two standards.’
The ASB has been trying to ensure convergence between its standards and IASs to reduce the impact of the change-over in 2005.
The main difference between FRS 17 and IAS 19 is that the international rule allows a pensions’ surplus or deficit to be disclosed and then amortised over a long period, usually 15 to 20 years.
But FRS 17 requires companies to recognise the pensions’ assets and liabilities immediately in the balance sheet. It does not allow for any smoothing mechanism to reduce volatility which is causing much consternation in the UK at present.
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day