The directive forces deposits held by UK residents in offshore EU
jurisdictions, such as Jersey, to be declared to the UK authorities or face a
Last week, Jersey announced that it had levied £13m in retention taxes as a
result of the directive.
Tax campaigner Richard Murphy said that more than £100m should have been
collected based on his analysis of Jersey figures of UK deposits on the island.
‘Funds must be held in entities owned by individuals in the UK and EU to
which the EU savings tax directive would not apply, such as trusts and
companies,’ he said.
The use of trusts has been especially controversial, since the UK Treasury
took the view that trusts were outside the scope of the directive, which
campaigners believe will open the way for further evasion.
A spokesman for the Jersey authorities cast doubt on the analysis, saying
that only a third of the Jersey deposits would be personal, and many would
relate to companies.
‘We don’t subscribe to the view that there is evasion through trusts. A trust
is not an inexpensive thing to set up. It’s not cost effective for small
depositors,’ he said.
A Treasury spokesman said that the operation of the directive was being
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The UK tax gap fell in 2014-15 to its lowest-ever level of 6.5%, revealed official statistics published today
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states