The English ICA’s disciplinary tribunal has been accused of excessive harshness in its treatment of an accountant fined #3,000 for using offensive language during a business dispute.
Adrian Thompson was also ordered to pay #1,800 in costs after the dispute with a bankrupt, who complained to the institute that Thompson was sending him abusive faxes.
Thompson, who denies the charges, said this week: ‘I feel let down by the institute. The fine with costs is higher than if I had committed an illegal offence, such as defrauding Customs & Excise. The affair has affected my personal life, business and health.’
Peter Mitchell, chairman of the Small Practitioners Association – which provided legal assistance to Thompson during the case – said the case highlighted practitioner concerns about the disciplinary system, particularly its harsh treatment of minor offences.
Mitchell said the case should not have been publicised and should not have merited such a large fine.
He added that changes expected as a result of the Beloff report – particularly a new ‘unpublicised caution’ for minor offences – met some of his concerns.
Douglas Llambias, an institute council member, said the fine seemed out of all proportion with others handed down by the institute, such as the #1,000 imposed on ‘cash-for-questions’ ex-MP Tim Smith, whose offences had been far more serious.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel