Ernst & Young is finally in the clear over its role in the controversial
2001 AOL-Time Warner merger after the last of hundreds of lawsuits was dismissed
in New York yesterday (30 Nov).
District judge Colleen MacMahon granted the Big Four’s motion to dismiss the
2003 lawsuit brought by AOL shareholder Dominic Amorosa as the time limit for
securities fraud cases had expired and the cases had failed to connect the
statements made by the auditor to stock losses.
Amorosa had accused E&Y of approving false and misleading financial
statements and concealing AOL’s improper methods of booking online advertising
revenue. E&Y claimed Amorosa, who dropped out of a class action lawsuit to
file his own case, was a “vexatious litigant pursuing clearly frivolous claims”.
The second largest improvement in ‘significant’ levels of financial distress since the EU Referendum was in professional services, found research from Begbies Traynor
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Investment in people, tech and businesses impacts on EY's profit per partner figure
If businesses do not take cyber security seriously in their business planning regulators may do it for them, the ICAEW has warned