BusinessCompany NewsOracle fights DoJ block on PeopleSoft bid

Oracle fights DoJ block on PeopleSoft bid

Oracle has vowed to fight the US Department of Justice's opposition to its $9.4bn hostile bid for PeopleSoft, saying that the government's case is 'without basis in fact or in law'.

Link: Oracle faces lawsuit over PeopleSoft pursuit

The database giant has also withdrawn its slate of proposed directors for elections due to be held at PeopleSoft’s annual general meeting on 25 March.

Yesterday, the DoJ, and seven the attorney generals of Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota and Texas, filed a 17-page civil antitrust lawsuit in the US district court to block Oracle’s for PeopleSoft.

The DoJ said the combination of Oracle and PeopleSoft would result in ‘higher prices, less innovation and fewer choices’ for users.

In a statement the DoJ said only Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP were considered able to supply large enterprises and institutions with integrated human resources management and financial services software.

‘We believe this transaction is anticompetitive – pure and simple,’ said R. Hewitt Pate, the DoJ’s assistant attorney general in charge of its antitrust division, in a statement.

‘Under any traditional merger analysis this deal substantially lessens competition in an important market,’ he added.

The seven states co-signing the suit had previously been conducting independent investigations into the proposed bid and its impact on public sector PeopleSoft users.

‘Oracle’s hostile takeover bid is bad for competition and that will hurt everyone’s bottom line,’ said Tom Reilly, attorney general for Massachusetts in a statement.

PeopleSoft called on Oracle to withdraw its bid, saying ‘both companies should now devote all their energy to competing in the marketplace.’

But Oracle will continue to fight in the courts. In a statement, the firm criticised the DoJ’s ‘unrealistic’ assessment of the market as being between three firms, describing it as a ‘highly competitive, dynamic and rapidly changing market’.

‘We believe the government’s case is without basis in fact or in law, and we look forward to proving this in court,’ said Jim Finn, Oracle spokesman.

Oracle said it has again extended its internal deadline for the bid from 12 March to 25 June to allow for legal proceedings – which will be more than a year later than its original bid.

Related Articles

BDO replaces Deloitte as Mitie auditor

Audit BDO replaces Deloitte as Mitie auditor

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
CVR Global appoints partner in London office

Company News CVR Global appoints partner in London office

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FTSE100 failing to provide adequate ethics information

Company News FTSE100 failing to provide adequate ethics information

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Moore Stephens recruits new private client partner

Accounting Firms Moore Stephens recruits new private client partner

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

Accounting Firms Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO on ‘recruitment spree’ with multiple partner appointments

Accounting Firms BDO on ‘recruitment spree’ with multiple partner appointments

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Brand strength leads to fee income growth for RSM

Accounting Firms Brand strength leads to fee income growth for RSM

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Mazars strengthens audit team with partner appointment

Accounting Firms Mazars strengthens audit team with partner appointment

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor