The database giant has also withdrawn its slate of proposed directors for elections due to be held at PeopleSoft’s annual general meeting on 25 March.
Yesterday, the DoJ, and seven the attorney generals of Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota and Texas, filed a 17-page civil antitrust lawsuit in the US district court to block Oracle’s for PeopleSoft.
The DoJ said the combination of Oracle and PeopleSoft would result in ‘higher prices, less innovation and fewer choices’ for users.
In a statement the DoJ said only Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP were considered able to supply large enterprises and institutions with integrated human resources management and financial services software.
‘We believe this transaction is anticompetitive – pure and simple,’ said R. Hewitt Pate, the DoJ’s assistant attorney general in charge of its antitrust division, in a statement.
‘Under any traditional merger analysis this deal substantially lessens competition in an important market,’ he added.
The seven states co-signing the suit had previously been conducting independent investigations into the proposed bid and its impact on public sector PeopleSoft users.
‘Oracle’s hostile takeover bid is bad for competition and that will hurt everyone’s bottom line,’ said Tom Reilly, attorney general for Massachusetts in a statement.
PeopleSoft called on Oracle to withdraw its bid, saying ‘both companies should now devote all their energy to competing in the marketplace.’
But Oracle will continue to fight in the courts. In a statement, the firm criticised the DoJ’s ‘unrealistic’ assessment of the market as being between three firms, describing it as a ‘highly competitive, dynamic and rapidly changing market’.
‘We believe the government’s case is without basis in fact or in law, and we look forward to proving this in court,’ said Jim Finn, Oracle spokesman.
Oracle said it has again extended its internal deadline for the bid from 12 March to 25 June to allow for legal proceedings – which will be more than a year later than its original bid.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements