Oracle fights DoJ block on PeopleSoft bid

Oracle fights DoJ block on PeopleSoft bid

Oracle has vowed to fight the US Department of Justice's opposition to its $9.4bn hostile bid for PeopleSoft, saying that the government's case is 'without basis in fact or in law'.

Link: Oracle faces lawsuit over PeopleSoft pursuit

The database giant has also withdrawn its slate of proposed directors for elections due to be held at PeopleSoft’s annual general meeting on 25 March.

Yesterday, the DoJ, and seven the attorney generals of Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, North Dakota and Texas, filed a 17-page civil antitrust lawsuit in the US district court to block Oracle’s for PeopleSoft.

The DoJ said the combination of Oracle and PeopleSoft would result in ‘higher prices, less innovation and fewer choices’ for users.

In a statement the DoJ said only Oracle, PeopleSoft and SAP were considered able to supply large enterprises and institutions with integrated human resources management and financial services software.

‘We believe this transaction is anticompetitive – pure and simple,’ said R. Hewitt Pate, the DoJ’s assistant attorney general in charge of its antitrust division, in a statement.

‘Under any traditional merger analysis this deal substantially lessens competition in an important market,’ he added.

The seven states co-signing the suit had previously been conducting independent investigations into the proposed bid and its impact on public sector PeopleSoft users.

‘Oracle’s hostile takeover bid is bad for competition and that will hurt everyone’s bottom line,’ said Tom Reilly, attorney general for Massachusetts in a statement.

PeopleSoft called on Oracle to withdraw its bid, saying ‘both companies should now devote all their energy to competing in the marketplace.’

But Oracle will continue to fight in the courts. In a statement, the firm criticised the DoJ’s ‘unrealistic’ assessment of the market as being between three firms, describing it as a ‘highly competitive, dynamic and rapidly changing market’.

‘We believe the government’s case is without basis in fact or in law, and we look forward to proving this in court,’ said Jim Finn, Oracle spokesman.

Oracle said it has again extended its internal deadline for the bid from 12 March to 25 June to allow for legal proceedings – which will be more than a year later than its original bid.

Share

Subscribe to get your daily business insights

Resources & Whitepapers

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often overlooked, always essential
AP

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often overlooked, always essentia...

2m Kloo

The importance of UX in accounts payable: Often ov...

Embracing user-friendly AP systems can turn the tide, streamlining workflows, enhancing compliance, and opening doors to early payment discounts. Read...

View article
The power of customisation in accounting systems
Accounting Software

The power of customisation in accounting systems

2m Kloo

The power of customisation in accounting systems

Organisations can enhance their financial operations' efficiency, accuracy, and responsiveness by adopting platforms that offer them self-service cust...

View article
Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine
Accounting Firms

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

3y Accountancy Age

Turn Accounts Payable into a value-engine

In a world of instant results and automated workloads, the potential for AP to drive insights and transform results is enormous. But, if you’re still ...

View resource
8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts payable efficiency
AP

8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts payable efficiency

2m Kloo

8 Key metrics to measure to optimise accounts paya...

Discover how AP dashboards can transform your business by enhancing efficiency and accuracy in tracking key metrics, as revealed by the latest insight...

View article