PracticeAuditBarings audit settlement faces hurdles

Barings audit settlement faces hurdles

Failure of Barings' creditors to reach a majority agreement could undo the settlement deal reached between its liquidators and Coopers & Lybrand, the collapsed bank's main auditor, it emerged this week.

The last-ditch out-of-court deal brokered by lawyers last week for liquidators at KPMG and Coopers, now PricewaterhouseCoopers, must overcome several potential obstacles before it is finalised.

Richard Heis, liquidator at KPMG, told Accountancy Age this week: ‘There are two hurdles. Every class of creditor, secured or subordinate, needs to agree the scheme.’

For the deal to go ahead 75% of creditors with the biggest stake, and 50% of the number of creditors must give their agreement.

If either 1986 noteholders or holders of the perpetual notes, both major groups of creditors, are unhappy with the deal and succeed in getting the other smaller groups of creditors on side the deal could be thrown out.

The value of the latest proposed deal has not yet been disclosed.

It is understood the last deal brokered in June failed due to demands by the 1986 noteholders – in this case, vulture funds – for a higher settlement figure.Another key issue is when the case against Deloitte & Touche, co-auditor of Barings’ Singapore subsidiary, would begin.

The case against Deloittes will not be able to begin until the settlement deal is sanctioned by the High Court, and that could take up to eight weeks. This also means that the case would not continue until early next year.

A statement made on behalf of Rick Murray, legal adviser to Deloitte & Touche Singapore said: ‘There is more confusion and mystery than information about the proposed ‘settlement’.

‘The confusions include the apparent inconsistency of an agreement, said to be unconditional, but also described by the liquidators as “without prejudice”.

‘The mysteries include why the settlement document, said to be hundreds of pages long that will require Chancery Court approval,should be kept secret from the High Court Judge and Deloittes. We are pleased that the Court has ordered these issues to be addressed as part of the next order of business in the case.’

Another possible hurdle is whether the creditors wish to continue funding a case which has already exceeded Pounds 100m in legal fees.

More details will emerge following a case management conference due to start on Monday, 22 October.

Links

Analysis: Battle of Barings rages on

PwC confirms Barings deal

Related Articles

PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

Audit PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

4d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

1w Carl Johnson, Stephensons
BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

Audit BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

Audit EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

Accounting Firms KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

Audit Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor