An ABI study has warned
that pensions reporting standards could force companies running final salary
schemes into a more restrained investment stance, to the cost of their members.
The influential body gave FRS17 a lukewarm assessment in its
Understanding Companies’ Pension Deficits’ report stating that the
standard had ‘ample room for improvement’.
FRS17 – designed to disclose pension liabilities on balance sheets – was
introduced as a way to reduce subjectivity in the valuation of pension assets
and liabilities, but the ABI raised doubts.
The body called for more comprehensive information on pension deficits to
avoid relying on a ‘headline’ value. It cautioned that headline figures, such as
the FRS17 deficit, were very volatile and effectively assumed funds would sell
the assets in the market and turn them into cash – the marked-to-market
The 52-page dossier stated that the problem with ‘balance sheet disclosure in
general and FRS17 in particular’ is that the information is condensed into a
single number on a standardised basis. It said that this only provided a
‘static’ picture of a scheme at a given point in time, but failed to address the
risks of changing assets and liabilities.
Improvements to cashflow statements are being targeted in a consultation launched by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC)
Dr Richard Willis provides a several thousand-year history lesson of the profession, from origin to modern-day
The Financial Reporting Council has issued guidance regarding the annual reporting of 1,200 large and smaller listed companies. The letter highlighted the key issues and improvements that can be made in the 2016 reporting season
Long-serving PwC director Fiona Westwood has moved to Smith & Williamson and stepped up to partner