At a meeting of the institute’s council on Wednesday, several members raised concerns over the proposed introduction of practice assurance measures.
Objections were voiced on the behalf of larger firms that the cost-benefit analysis of the scheme was not convincing. The measures were also criticised for being too ‘politically correct’.
Maurice Ede, chairman of the ICAEW’s Professional Standards Board, said there had been a communication failure between the institute and larger firms because the initial focus had been to reassure smaller ones. ‘We will have to correct that,’ he said.
The council has decided to put the issue to the vote of the membership at the June AGM, one year later than originally scheduled. A two thirds majority will be required for practice assurance to be adopted.
A new head of solutions, Aidan Brennan, has been appointed at KPMG UK
Hundreds of jobs are secure after Spectrum Contracting has been sold out of administration to Minstrell Recruitment by FRP Advisory
Cowgill Holloway and Warings Business Advisors have merged, with a range of growth plans in the North West put in place
The Practitioner discusses their timesheet militancy, and reaction to someone playing it fast and loose with the details...