More NewsHundreds face restatement in wake of standards chaos

Hundreds face restatement in wake of standards chaos

Companies face restatements after interpretations body dismisses questions over IFRS

Hundreds of companies will be forced to restate their accounts after a spate
of unexpected re-assessments of international accounting standards.

As many as 40 accounting treatments proposed by companies have been rejected
this year by the
International Financial
Reporting Interpretations Committee
(IFRIC), prompting a likely wave of
restatements, senior figures said.

The disagreements over accounting treatments have arisen as IFRS has been
implemented, and prompted complaints that restatements seem an unduly harsh
punishment for companies with genuine misunderstandings, and also create the
potential for abuse.

While it is not yet clear how many or which UK companies have to restate
their accounts, IFRIC sources said hundreds of businesses worldwide could have
to restate accounts in which their lease figures were incorrectly treated.

Other key areas where there have been disagreements include revenue
recognition and the reporting of income tax charges.

Richard Thorpe, head of accounting and auditing policy at the FSA and the
UK’s representative at the
Committee
of European Securities Regulators
(CESR), said: ‘We’re concerned about
market reaction to rejections on the basis that the standard is clear.

‘There is general agreement in CESR that where the standard is clear, then it
should be treated as a correction of an error arriving from a period of
misunderstanding.

‘It’s more important that a company should not be punished by the markets or
otherwise, for making those sorts of errors, ‘said Thorpe.

IFRIC previously issued rejections without commenting or offering reasons.
But in order to be helpful, it began explaining why it had rejected certain
accounting treatments.

But Ken Wild, Deloitte partner and IFRIC committee member said that this
process began to move too close to interpretations, for which there are
consequences in some countries.

‘We have moved away from saying things are clear, to giving reasons for this,
and then accepting that we’re all part of a learning process, especially given
the application of IFRS,’ said Wild.

The process may now also be open to abuse, he said.

‘There is a danger, if we say this is part of the learning process, that
somebody may now engage in practice with intent and thereafter immediately issue
a question with IFRIC to cover themselves,’ he said.

The US market particularly tends to interpret restatements as errors unless
accounts have been restated due to a new accounting standard.

Further reading:

IFRS update Summer 2006 – lost in
translation

Related Articles

Amazon UK halves its corporation tax bill despite increased turnover

More News Amazon UK halves its corporation tax bill despite increased turnover

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Increase in UK business confidence despite Brexit, according to ICAEW

More News Increase in UK business confidence despite Brexit, according to ICAEW

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Live blog: Spring Budget 2017

Corporate Tax Live blog: Spring Budget 2017

7m Accountancy Age editorial
"Not enough time" to implement MTD by 2018, says Tyrie

Corporate Tax "Not enough time" to implement MTD by 2018, says Tyrie

10m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Colin: A spoonful of investment...

Governance Colin: A spoonful of investment...

10m Stephanie Wix, Writer
The Curious Incident of the Insolvency Sector in the Light of Economic Turbulence

Insolvency The Curious Incident of the Insolvency Sector in the Light of Economic Turbulence

8m Accountancy Age editorial
Leonard Curtis called in as administrators for builders Boshers

Legal Leonard Curtis called in as administrators for builders Boshers

8m Stephanie Wix, Writer
New Year Honours of 2017

Accounting Standards New Year Honours of 2017

9m Stephanie Wix, Writer