The Auditing Practices Board this week proposed a new definition of auditors’ responsibility that would limit their requirement to review corporate governance arrangements set out in the Combined Code, writes John Stokdyk.
In its consultation document, ‘Auditors’ Responsibility Statements and Auditors’ Reports on Corporate Governance’, published yesterday, the APB recommended dropping the Combined Code’s requirement for auditors to review seven governance provisions.
The code, which amalgamates the findings of the Hampel, Cadbury and Greenbury committees, is due to come into force for year-ends after 30 December.
Instead, the document sets out a new ‘comprehensive’ statement, explaining that auditors review all the information in the annual report – including directors’ statements on corporate governance.
Jon Grant, the APB’s technical director, pointed out the new Stock Exchange Listing Rules require auditors to review only 7 out of 49 provisions in the Combined Code compared to 11 out of 19 in the current Cadbury code.
‘Looking at the detail of a portion of the code doesn’t add much assurance to users,’ said Grant. ‘We’re not trying to run away from existing responsibilities, but trying to stand back from what is currently done.’
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel