PracticePeople In PracticePricewaterhouseCoopers leads uproar over internet spying plans

PricewaterhouseCoopers leads uproar over internet spying plans

US regulators are preparing to use keyword search technology to track down 'get rich quick' schemes and curb online investor fraud.

But some privacy advocates are up in arms, and consultant PricewaterhouseCoopers is among a number of companies that have refused to bid on the contract to operate the system.

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is in the process of considering bids for an automated surveillance system that will monitor certain public aspects of the web with the aim of finding fraudulent securities-related activities by targeting phrases such as ‘get rich quick!’.

The system will copy online material into a database to be analysed by SEC investigators.

No timetable for implementation of the system has been established, said SEC spokesman Chris Ullman, adding that the Commission already surveys the web manually. An automated system would be more efficient and cheaper than the manual method, he said.

George Getz, a spokesman for US political body the Libertarian Party, said: “This is government spying on the innocent. It’s no different than the police tapping everyone’s phones just because someone might have committed a crime.”

However, Ullman said the system would only monitor public forums such as websites and newsgroups, and would not cover chat rooms or private communications such as email.

“The Commission has a long-standing concern and respect for the First Amendment, and throughout the procurement process we have abided by both the letter and spirit of privacy laws,” said Ullman.

“Throughout the request for proposals there are a number of references to what the rules are and what the limits are on both the Commission and the vendor in terms of what information they can gather and where they can search.”

If the surveillance programme turns up evidence which the SEC feels merits the interception of private emails, the Commission would have to go through the subpoena process like any other agency, said Ullman.

PwC was one of 107 companies that the SEC invited to bid to operate the system, but the consultant chose not to do so because of concerns about privacy and possible violations of constitutional protections against unreasonable search and seizure.

“It is equivalent of planting a bug,” said Larry Ponemon, one of the partners in charge of privacy issues at PwC.

Ullman said he is not aware of any similar concerns from other companies that were given the opportunity to bid on the project.

AccountancyAge.com feature – Are dot.com investors living in wonderland?

Related Articles

Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

Accounting Firms Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
CIMA elects new president

Institutes CIMA elects new president

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

Governance Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

Accounting Firms Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

Accounting Firms EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

Accounting Firms FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

Accounting Firms Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

Accounting Firms MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor