TaxCorporate TaxOff balance sheet structures too risky

Off balance sheet structures too risky

Accounting rules which allowed risky structures to be kept off the balance sheet are to be revised, with the structures no longer being allowed

Problematic rules: Robert Herz

Problematic rules: Robert Herz

The move is one of several plans to revise the rules announced by standard
setters in response to the global credit crunch.

The rules on off balance sheet structures allowed lenders to keep risky
assets off their books, but were forced to bring them on to the books when their
valuations dropped in a spiralling market, causing billions in writedowns.

Financial Accounting Standards
Board
chairman Robert Herz said the group had been tasked by the US
President’s Working Group to fix the problematic rules by the end of the year.

The FASB has resolved to ‘kill’ qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs)
which allowed lenders to take assets off their balance sheets.

Herz described the off balance sheet structures as ‘ticking bombs’, which
were tolerable until recently.

‘Once subprime mortgages were put into QSPEs, they were ticking time bombs.

‘And the bombs started to explode. The vehicles required “intensive
restructuring” that went beyond what would have been allowed for a QSPE,’ said
Herz.

He said that he did not believe there was any gap in the disclosure
requirements of US GAAP or SEC rules.

‘Fin 46 listed disclosures, but until things went downhill they didn’t always
illicit the kind of disclosures that were intended,’ said Herz.

IASB chairman Sir
David Tweedie said the boards were looking at consolidation of SPEs,
derecognition of the vehicles, and measuring financial assets and liabilities at
fair value ­ each of which raised different issues during the credit crunch,
often exacerbating problems on balance sheets.

‘It’s quite clear from the reaction of the Financial Stability Forum, in its
report to the G7, in which we were involved, that there is great concern on the
three issues,’ said Tweedie.

To accelerate the review, the IASB will jump the discussion document stage
and instead publish exposure drafts.

Related Articles

Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

Corporate Tax Big names, little tax: Airbnb, Facebook, Kellogg’s, eBay

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

Corporate Tax EU divided over radical tax reforms targeting tech giants

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

Administration ‘Improve rather than lose’ disincorporation relief, tax body urges

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

Corporate Tax How to educate your clients about tax avoidance

3m Clear Books | Sponsored
CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

Corporate Tax CGT clampdown nets HMRC £124m – but could lead to increase in use of avoidance schemes

3m Austin Clark, Reporter
‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

Corporate Tax ‘Google tax’ nets HMRC £281m

3m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

Corporate Tax Should I incorporate my buy-to-let business?

4m Emma Rawson