The institute’s chief executive Eric Anstee wrote to the OFT’s executive director Penny Boys disputing the findings of the report.
In particular the assertion that professional indemnity insurance capacity and premiums are expected to improve in the medium term ‘does not square with what our member firms are being told by insurers’, Anstee wrote.
Anstee also argued that evidence from mid-tier firms had been ignored, with many wanting to compete against the big four for audit work, but were reluctant to do so because of the potential exposure and unavailability of insurance.
In addition Anstee said that the report ‘addressed a fundamentally different question’ to the one that had been asked, namely whether a cap would be pro-competitive rather than whether it would maintain the current level of competition.
The OFT has previously said that anyone disagreeing with the reports findings should make their case to the DTI.
HMRC breaches client confidentiality; and partner profits fall at EY. These stories and more discussed in Friday Afternoon Live
Two new audit partners have been appointed at the firm BDO in its audit practice following continued growth and investment
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
Six new partners have been revealed by top ten firm Mazars