More NewsAdvisers in line for windfall after Conde Naste victory

Advisers in line for windfall after Conde Naste victory

VAT claims could generate hefty fees from up to £1bn of rebates

Advisers could earn a significant chunk of a £1bn VAT reclaim by hundreds of
companies, after publishers
Condé
Nast
won a major victory in the House of Lords.

‘This litigation has been running for many years. The decision will be
welcomed by the many professional advisers who took a stake in the outcome of
the case by agreeing contingency fees for processing taxpayers’ claims, ‘ said
Jason Collins, partner at McGrigors.

‘This fee income will provide a welcome windfall at a time when the prospects
for professional services in the short term are looking uncertain,’ he added.

The government tried to introduce a transitional period for tax claims after it
had lost in the courts against Marks and Spencer for attempting to introduce a
time limit on claims.

HM Revenue & Customs then sought to introduce a transitional period in
the form of issuing ‘business briefs’ to stop claims going back further than
1996.

The courts decided that the transitional period was not effective for input
tax claimants and that the taxpayer could make claims as far back as 1973, when
the UK entered the European Common Market.

Experts suggested that output tax claimants, who were specifically targeted
under the original ‘business brief’ transitional period, might also be able to
make claims under the ruling, as the judges pointed towards the period’s
unlawfulness.

‘The fight may not end here, however ­ many taxpayers will look to be
compensated with full commercial rates of interest calculated on a compound
basis, rather than the low simple rate of interest provided for under statute.
Given the age of the claims, compounding could result in an interest award more
than five times greater than the tax itself,’ said Chris Morgan, head of KPMG’s
international tax group.

He added that the decision would force the taxman to introduce a reasonable
time period for claims occurring between 1973 and 2003. ‘I would expect at least
a six-month period,’ said Morgan.

Tony McClenaghan, head of indirect tax at Deloitte, which acted for Condé
Nast, said: ‘The successful culmination of the litigation means that CNP will
finally receive the VAT which it is lawfully entitled to and clearly this ruling
has implications for other businesses.’

HMRC said that the three-year time limit for VAT claims still applies to tax
periods starting on or after 1 May 1997.

Advisers
to get Condé Nast windfall

Condé
Nast wins landmark VAT case

Related Articles

Amazon UK halves its corporation tax bill despite increased turnover

More News Amazon UK halves its corporation tax bill despite increased turnover

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Increase in UK business confidence despite Brexit, according to ICAEW

More News Increase in UK business confidence despite Brexit, according to ICAEW

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Live blog: Spring Budget 2017

Corporate Tax Live blog: Spring Budget 2017

9m Accountancy Age editorial
The Curious Incident of the Insolvency Sector in the Light of Economic Turbulence

Insolvency The Curious Incident of the Insolvency Sector in the Light of Economic Turbulence

11m Accountancy Age editorial
Leonard Curtis called in as administrators for builders Boshers

Legal Leonard Curtis called in as administrators for builders Boshers

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
New Year Honours of 2017

Accounting Standards New Year Honours of 2017

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
"Not enough time" to implement MTD by 2018, says Tyrie

Corporate Tax "Not enough time" to implement MTD by 2018, says Tyrie

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer
Colin: A spoonful of investment...

Governance Colin: A spoonful of investment...

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer