TaxPersonal TaxRoger Cockfield – Confusion over tax credits

Roger Cockfield - Confusion over tax credits

The British government is breaking international law by forcing companies to bear the cost of administering the working families tax credit

The fact that employers will, from October, be responsible for makingnies to bear the cost of administering the working families tax credit, says Roger Cockfield. welfare payments under the Working Families Tax Credit scheme amounts to the partial privatisation of the social security system.

Employers will not only have to operate the system but will need to modify their cash-flow budgets to take account of what can be substantial payments. For example, a couple with four children, paying childcare costs of #7,800 per year, where the wife earns #,3000 and the husband earns #6,000, will receive WFTC of #10,610. The husband’s employer will be paying 66% more in WFTC than pay for each pay period. This will cause a major problem for those industries with large numbers of low-paid employees such as the hotel sector.

The Tax Credits Bill presented to the House of Commons in December does not provide any compensation or payment for the additional work and will penalise those employers that fail to operate it.

Article 1 of Protocol 1 of the Convention on Human Rights states: ‘Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions.

No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.

‘The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way, mitigate the right of a state to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest, or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties’.

The obligation to operate WFTC amounts to a deprivation of property.

Part 2 of Article 1 is a clear exception for the payment of taxes, such as PAYE, and collection of national insurance contributions. Part 2 is only necessary as the payment of taxes is not covered by the public interest exception in Part 1. It is arguable that this Part 2 exception does not apply to the payment of welfare benefits.

The next question to ask is whether the WFTC is a tax or a benefit. Calling a benefit a tax credit does not, in my opinion, change its nature. I would apply the duck test. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then it is a duck whatever name it is called.

Firms might like to keep a record of the cost of operating WFTC so that when there is a successful challenge under Article 1 in the High Court, they are able to submit invoices to the Inland Revenue.

Roger Cockfield is reader in taxation at De Montfort University.

Related Articles

Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

2m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

5m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

7m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

7m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter