Many senior partners in the big firms think having lawyers round the partnership table makes a lot of sense. This week’s news that a Law Society poll has produced a clear majority of solicitors in favour of creating multidisciplinary practices is clearly good news for them. But is it good news for the profession as a whole? And, more importantly, is it what clients really want?
Clients, of course, want different things in different situations. A UK company opening an office in Azerbaijan almost certainly wants a one-stop shop which will provide advice on structuring the business, paying local taxes and staying within local laws. But the same client contemplating a major acquisition within the UK almost certainly wants legal advice that is independent of a firm which may audit or provide other advice to the target company.
If the stakes are really high then only the top legal brains will do, irrespective of whether they belong to the company’s professional advice firm or not. To say nothing of the colossal conflicts of interest that may arise if the audit firm’s lawyers are called in to advise on how much the company is obliged to tell the auditors.
However desirable MDPs may be to some clients they require much more thought. It may be that they will only work outside the UK. Or it may be that the big firms will have to invest much more effort in building really effective Chinese walls before business decides MDPs are worth the risk.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel