PracticeAccounting FirmsCall to use JDS fine to pay Equitable investors

Call to use JDS fine to pay Equitable investors

Equitable Members Action Group demands that any fine imposed on E&Y should be handed over to former Equitable Life policy holders

joint disciplinary scheme logo

The case has been referred to the JDS

Any fine imposed on Ernst & Young as a result of the disciplinary
investigation into the firm’s conduct while auditor of Equitable Life should be
handed over to former policy holders, according to the action group representing
their interests.

The claim ­ from the Equitable Members Action Group ­ concerns a tribunal
reviewing the role auditors Ernst & Young played during the 2000 collapse of
the life insurer. The case was referred to the Joint Disciplinary Scheme by the
ICAEW.

John Newman, chairman of the group, has written to the ICAEW president David
Furst, asking him to consider handing over the money to a policyholders trust
fund if the firm is found ‘culpable’.

In the letter he claims ‘a fine ­ if this were levied [would] accrue in the
main to the ICAEW and hence ultimately reduce the subscriptions of the members…
but the public interest is not served, those who suffered because of the
Equitable debacle are the policyholders of Equitable.

‘It may be possible for there to be a contract in which Ernst & Young
accepts a degree of culpability and makes a substantial payment to the
policyholders trust fund; the JDS would join the contract and make levying a
nominal fine conditional on such a payment being made.’

Policyholders lost an estimated £4bn in savings when Equitable Life collapsed
after it emerged that it did not have the cash it had guaranteed to some
policyholders.
A £2.6bn civil claim brought against Ernst & Young in 2003 was thrown out by
a High Court judge.

JDS executive counsel Chris Dickson said there was no provision in the JDS
scheme
for compensation. ‘Any penalty imposed would go into offsetting the costs of the
tribunal. Any matter for compensation was a matter for the civil court,’ Dickson
said.

JDS conclusions on E&Y are expected at the end of the year. Both the
ICAEW and E&Y declined to comment.

Related Articles

Sexual harassment – is accountancy next for #MeToo?

Accounting Firms Sexual harassment – is accountancy next for #MeToo?

3d Karen Baxter, Lewis Silkin
Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

Accounting Firms Johnston Carmichael CEO appointed as ICAS president

4w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

Accounting Firms British Accountancy Awards 2018 – entries open!

1m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

Accounting Firms Is the accountancy sector facing an international talent crisis?

1m Lewis Silkin
RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

Accounting Firms RSM appoints new Chief Operating Officer

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
RSM announces 11 partner promotions

Accounting Firms RSM announces 11 partner promotions

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

Accounting Firms BDO hires former AstraZeneca creative director as head of digital and innovation

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

Accounting Firms What does the future hold for listed accountancy firms?

2m Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin