PracticeAccounting FirmsCall to use JDS fine to pay Equitable investors

Call to use JDS fine to pay Equitable investors

Equitable Members Action Group demands that any fine imposed on E&Y should be handed over to former Equitable Life policy holders

joint disciplinary scheme logo

The case has been referred to the JDS

Any fine imposed on Ernst & Young as a result of the disciplinary
investigation into the firm’s conduct while auditor of Equitable Life should be
handed over to former policy holders, according to the action group representing
their interests.

The claim ­ from the Equitable Members Action Group ­ concerns a tribunal
reviewing the role auditors Ernst & Young played during the 2000 collapse of
the life insurer. The case was referred to the Joint Disciplinary Scheme by the
ICAEW.

John Newman, chairman of the group, has written to the ICAEW president David
Furst, asking him to consider handing over the money to a policyholders trust
fund if the firm is found ‘culpable’.

In the letter he claims ‘a fine ­ if this were levied [would] accrue in the
main to the ICAEW and hence ultimately reduce the subscriptions of the members…
but the public interest is not served, those who suffered because of the
Equitable debacle are the policyholders of Equitable.

‘It may be possible for there to be a contract in which Ernst & Young
accepts a degree of culpability and makes a substantial payment to the
policyholders trust fund; the JDS would join the contract and make levying a
nominal fine conditional on such a payment being made.’

Policyholders lost an estimated £4bn in savings when Equitable Life collapsed
after it emerged that it did not have the cash it had guaranteed to some
policyholders.
A £2.6bn civil claim brought against Ernst & Young in 2003 was thrown out by
a High Court judge.

JDS executive counsel Chris Dickson said there was no provision in the JDS
scheme
for compensation. ‘Any penalty imposed would go into offsetting the costs of the
tribunal. Any matter for compensation was a matter for the civil court,’ Dickson
said.

JDS conclusions on E&Y are expected at the end of the year. Both the
ICAEW and E&Y declined to comment.

Related Articles

Productive accountancy firms lead the way

Accounting Firms Productive accountancy firms lead the way

8h Simon Adcock, HSBC
LLPs in Top 50+50: Will LLPs continue to be the preferred set-up?

Accounting Firms LLPs in Top 50+50: Will LLPs continue to be the preferred set-up?

1d Fergus Payne, Lewis Silkin
BDO’s global revenues pass $8bn

Accounting Firms BDO’s global revenues pass $8bn

1w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances: Finding growth amid uncertainty

Accounting Firms Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances: Finding growth amid uncertainty

1w Philip Smith, Reporter
Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances 2017: Big Four tussle for top spot

Accounting Firms Top 40 International Networks, Associations and Alliances 2017: Big Four tussle for top spot

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
BDO reports revenue growth of 5.7%

Accounting Firms BDO reports revenue growth of 5.7%

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Taylorcocks announces merger with Surrey firm

Accounting Firms Taylorcocks announces merger with Surrey firm

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Kingston Smith reports 7% gender pay gap

Accounting Firms Kingston Smith reports 7% gender pay gap

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor