It suggested the idea at a conference it organised in Brussels. OLAF asked the 150 delegates to develop a system exchanging ‘information about detected fraudulent misappropriation of international aid funds’to ‘help donors and investigators cross-check their information about recipients of international aid and verify doubts about their handling of funds…’
Such a system would resemble the USA General Accounting Office’s FraudNET, which allows whistle-blowers to report allegations of fraud, waste, abuse, or mismanagement of federal government funds by e-mail, fax or post. Tipsters can remain anonymous and are encouraged to provide maximum detail about ‘the who, when, where, what, how and how much’.
In a post-conference note OLAF said: ‘The fight against fraudulent misappropriation of international aid funds is an enormous challenge. The mere falsification and multiple use of invoice or the intentional non-realisation of a subsidised project are only the most obvious examples.’ More complex cases were highlighted by the conference, such as fictitious participation of organisations in a consortium to boost grant sizes.
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements