Varney attacked over EDS deal and lack of ‘fair play’

Varney attacked over EDS deal and lack of 'fair play'

MPs probe Sir David Varney over deal with EDS on tax credits system

varney, hmrc

HMRC’s tax credits settlement with EDS ‘affects fair play’ in the sector, MPs
said today as HMRC chairman Sir David Varney sought to defend his department’s
deal with the IT contractor.

Amidst some intense questioning at the Commons Treasury sub-committee today,
Jim Cousins, the Labour MP for Newcastle-upon-Tyne, asked Sir David: ‘how can
you have fair play within the public sector [after the deal]’?

The deal was structured so that part of the £71m payment, agreed as
compensation for the failures of the tax credits IT system, would be paid out of
future deals signed with government.

Critics have said it means IT procurement is now not a level playing field,
with suggestions that government departments might favour EDS in order for HMRC
to recover its money,

Responding, Sir David said: ‘It does not affect fair play. HMRC retains the
right to pursue its claims. This is a very good settlement for HMRC.’

He added: ‘EDS would not move [on the deal] unless some part of the payment
was deferred. I took the view – and I still take the view – that the public
purse was better protected by a larger settlement rather than a lower one.

‘Nothing we have done is meant to influence any decision about anybody in
government to procure services from EDS,’ he said.

HMRC takes the view that there are sufficient procedures in place to prevent
any favouritism. Varney said his legal advice had been that the deal did not
breach EU guidelines on the issue.

Sir David also disclosed that any court case would have cost £20m and taken
two years.

He also hit back at those who leaked details of the settlement, saying that
he had given evidence in private to the public accounts committee, adding: ‘Our
legal advisers write to them to raise legal concerns. Publication could
jeopardise a potential legal action against EDS in the future.’

Some £47m has been paid as cash or cash equivalent so far, he said.
Dislcosure had left him in an ‘extraordinary’ position, he said.

Read Tax Hack on the issue at
taxhack.accountancyage.com

Related Articles

Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

Legal Supreme Court rules against Pimlico Plumbers in landmark employment case

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

Personal Tax Inheritance tax is 'unfit for modern society' and should be abolished, says think tank

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

Personal Tax Rent-a-room relief – the survey says…

4m Helen Thornley, ATT Technical Officer
What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

Personal Tax What should the OTS prioritise in its review of inheritance tax?

6m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

7m Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

9m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

9m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer