PracticeAuditAuditors exposed to negligence claims

Auditors exposed to negligence claims

In a climate of mounting litigation against firms and individuals, continued misconceptions about insurance cover are leaving auditors open to negligence claims by clients, litigation experts have warned.

With confidence in auditors currently at rock bottom, Emile Woolf, chairman of the ICAEW professional indemnity insurance panel, said: ‘There’s a huge number of misconceptions about the nature of the insurance of which accountants are obliged to seek.’

He told a seminar hosted by law firm Reynolds Porter Chamberlain last week: ‘Few firms fully understand the concept of taking over another practice, for example.’

Besides negligence claims against auditors, Woolf pinpointed two other potential pitfalls where accountants continually fall foul of insurers. In takeovers, Woolf said accountants imprudently believe any past liability remains with the firm that had been taken over. But unless there are specific exclusion clauses stated in the agreement, the new firm would be liable, he told the seminar.

And Woolf said firms are still not clear on the differences between ‘aggregate cover’ and ‘each and every cover’. The latter covers each claim.

‘All they want to do is have a cover that complies with the rules and nothing else. They don’t even read the policy,’ warned Woolf.

Woolf insisted these misconceptions were not just limited to small or sole practitioners, but to firms of all sizes. Lawyers also emphasised the importance of engagement letters, particularly for auditors.

Alex Hamer, partner in insurance services at RPC, said engagement letters should outline the services to be performed, responsibilities of the client and restrictions on any work that was to be undertaken.

‘There’s a huge expectation gap between auditors and clients as far as what they can provide. A letter of engagement should not only define the terms of the engagement but should also manage client expectations and protect the accountant in the event of a dispute.’

Related Articles

PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

Audit PwC replaces EY as Domino's auditor

3d Alia Shoaib, Reporter
The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

Audit The ‘uncomfortable truth’ behind FRC’s Big Four fines recommendations

1w Carl Johnson, Stephensons
BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

Audit BDO holds off Big Four to retain top position as AIM auditor

1w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

Audit FRC urged to fine Big Four firms penalties over £10m

3w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

Audit EY to audit Standard Chartered bank

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

Accounting Firms KPMG replaces PwC as Croda auditor

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

Accounting Standards EY fined £1.8m over Tech Data audit

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

Audit Top 50+50: Firms post significant growth in new tax and audit rankings

2m Emma Smith, Managing Editor