The judges instead increased the award by a further £950 in a dispute over property sale taxation.
The firm had challenged the September 1999 decision of High Court deputy Judge David Foskett QC to award Richard Little, John Smith and Gerard Wade £50,946 on the basis of the accountants’ negligence in working as auditors and tax advisers to the claimants’ company, DWW Holdings Ltd.
The men had sought the firm’s advice to reduce tax payable on twotransactions – the purchase of another partner’s share in the business for £209,000 and the £349,999 sale of a property known as The Old Bakery, in Harlow.
However, Lords Justices Peter Gibson and Clarke and Mr Justice Maurice Kay refused the accountants’ appeal. Instead they allowed the three men’s cross appeal and increased the award to £51,895.
They backed the judge’s findings that the accountants were negligent in giving advice on two tax-limiting schemes, and failing to advise properly on the importance of timing the schemes correctly.
Little and others v George Little Sebire & Co – COA – 14 June – before Peter Gibson and Clark LJJ and Maurice Kay J – Giles Goodfellow instructed by Wright Hassal & Co of Leamington Spa for Little and others – Patrick Lawrence instructed by Kennedys for George Little Sebire & Co
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel