At a meeting of the European Commission’s accounting regulatory committee earlier this week, four nations – France, Belgium, Italy and Spain – said they opposed the use of IAS39 in its current form by the EU’s listed companies in the EU from 2005. Six others – Germany, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia, Luxembourg and Malta – abstained while the remaining 15, including the UK, voted in favour.
The EC is now waiting for the member states to confirm their views in writing by 30 June. It could take as few as two of the abstaining states to come out against adoption of IAS39 in their written view to create a blocking minority, which would derail the implementation of the standard.
‘The commission will clarify the way it intends to move forward with IAS39 once it has the definitive view of member states and of EFRAG,’ said a commission spokesman.
EFRAG, the EC’s accounting advisers, has published a consultation document proposing endorsement, even though more than half of its members voted against the standard. However, EFRAG’s rules require a two-thirds majority to recommend non-endorsement.
Failure by the EC to adopt the standard would severely damage the chances of eventual convergence of international standards with US accounting standards.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel