TaxPersonal TaxPension funds facing tax clampdown after Revenue loses court battle

Pension funds facing tax clampdown after Revenue loses court battle

The Inland Revenue is set to dramatically step up its efforts to clamp down on blue-chip company pension schemes, according to senior tax experts.

Experts believe the Revenue is aiming to increase attempts to tackle the issue of whether it can charge income tax on sub-underwriting activities of pension schemes.

The warning follows the conclusion of a long running court battle last month between British Telecom and the Inland Revenue. The Court of Appeal ruled the Revenue could not charge income tax if the investment is to provide income for a pension investment.

However the Revenue is understood to be deciding whether to lobby the House of Lords to reopen the case.

If the Revenue is successful in reopening the case and wins, large companies could be landed with potentially multi-million pound tax bills, while revenue coffers would be significantly increased.

The appeal centred on whether income earned from the sub-underwriting activities of the trustees at some of the country’s largest private-sector occupational pension schemes should be labelled trading income and remain exempt from tax.

Despite the ruling in favour of BT, which has a pension fund valued at more than £10bn, experts fear the case will not prevent the Revenue stepping up what is believed to be a concentrated fight against large company schemes.

Paul Lynam, KPMG senior manager of tax investigations, warned: ‘Other schemes will certainly be caught out by the Inland Revenue, which is stepping up large company investigations. There is a danger the revenue will investigate each company scheme on a case by case basis.’

Deloitte & Touche corporate tax partner, Chris Fitzgibbon, added: ‘The IR is keen to ensure a number of company pension funds comply with compliance aspects of tax legislation.’

The fears of tax experts were compounded at the appeal, when president, Lord Justice Robert Walker, said other pension schemes could not rely on this decision.

The case arose in 1998 when the Revenue identified the sub-underwriting in the BT scheme at a level above ‘normal activities.’

The Revenue was not available to comment.

Taxman receives £200m blow as pension funds win court battle

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

2d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter