PracticeAuditGovernment under pressure to resurrect limited liability deals

Government under pressure to resurrect limited liability deals

Lord Mandelson under more pressure to limit auditors' liability as economic situation worsens and risk of major audit firms exiting the market increases

Lord Mandelson

Lord Mandelson

Business secretary Lord Mandelson is to come under renewed pressure to limit
auditors’ liability by statute as the economic situation deteriorates and the
risk of a major audit firm exiting the market increases.

Last week US regulators indicated to the UK government that they would not
accept agreements between an auditor and clients registered in the US that limit
liabilities on a proportionate basis.

The news delivered a blow to hopes for a liability cap but key figures in the
profession have now switched their attention to lobbying for statutory change
permitting caps. It is understood that the government official likely to face
the call will be Geoff Dart, a director overseeing governance and corporate law
at the department for business.

‘It’s a major disappointment that the SEC has taken this stance. It’s
important that there’s a proper reaction from the UK authorities on this matter
because otherwise we are getting to a stalemate at precisely the time where the
pressure on auditors is growing,’ said Martyn Jones, national audit technical
partner at Deloitte.

It is understood the SEC’s main objection is the potential abuse of auditor
independence due to an overly cosy relationship between auditors and company
directors.

Peter Wyman, head of professional affairs at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said:
‘The reality is that this is an agreement between auditors and shareholders.
There’s no independence impairment.’

The Companies Act 2006 removed a previous legal bar to limited liability
agreements (LLAs) to allow auditors to agree proportionate liability with
clients on a contract basis. With the SEC decision disallowing LLAs with around
half of the FTSE-100 because they are listed in the US, the uneven playing field
will make it difficult for auditors to reduce their exposure with other listed
clients.

Campaigners believe the position would change if proportionality is written
into law. The department for trade, although it has opportunities over the next
six months to legislate on the issue, said it ‘has no plans to legislate
further’.

‘We need this done and we need it done quickly. If there was a need before
the credit crunch then we need it now more than ever. I don’t think it’s a big
shift in policy. You can get the same end but by law,’ said Wyman.

Related Articles

Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

Audit Is predictive analytics the end of the annual audit?

6d Martin Herron, MHA MacIntyre Hudson
Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

Audit Auditors ‘in the dock’ over Carillion as report calls for Big Four break-up

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
PCAOB sanctions former Deloitte Turkey CEOs over altered documents

Audit PCAOB sanctions former Deloitte Turkey CEOs over altered documents

2w Alia Shoaib, Reporter
KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

Audit KPMG South Africa to review past audit work amid fresh scandal

1m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

Audit FRC introduces £10m sanctions for Big Four firms

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

Audit Ukraine’s PrivatBank files $3bn claim against PwC

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

Audit Grant Thornton to exit FTSE 350 audit market, citing Big Four dominance

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

Audit Big Four dominate FTSE 250 audit market in Q1 rankings

3m Alia Shoaib, Reporter