PracticePeople In PracticeSurviving scapegoat status

Surviving scapegoat status

Despite what the pessimists say, the first year of self-assessment was not bad news all round. The Inland Revenue is being unfairly criticised, says David Guest.

Judging from the comments of the accountancy profession’s pessimists,s not bad news all round. The Inland Revenue is being unfairly criticised, says David Guest. you would think that the end of the first year of self-assessment had marked not just a drama but a full-blown crisis. And that the blame for this lay squarely with the Inland Revenue.

It worries me that this impression is unbalanced – and that it harms the reputation of the profession and those allied to it.

Yes, the first year of self-assessment was always going to be the most difficult. And the interpretation of the rules by local tax offices might have been a headache for some accountants. But there are many thousands of practitioners who, despite the difficulties, have succeeded in alerting their clients to the new regime and filing accurate returns on time.

They are ill-served by those accountants and software suppliers who have sought to make a scapegoat of the Revenue. It has been well-documented in this newspaper that software for self-assessment has been a particular source of complaint in the past year, yet in our opinion the Revenue gave software suppliers much more help than we expected at this time last year.

As a result, my company was able to send out self-assessment software to its customers last March, before the tax year even began. In this as in much else, the Revenue made commendable efforts to smooth the passage to self-assessment for accountants and service providers.

Unfortunately, when the profession and some of the software industry make a song and dance about the first year of self-assessment, they can too easily be accused of acting out of self-interest and the fear of litigation from aggrieved clients.

And that risks damaging the reputation of both the profession and the tax software industry as objective commentators on tax matters. Let’s not forget that almost as many finance directors polled by Accountancy Age were satisfied with the Revenue’s handling of self-assessment as were dissatisfied.

Given that blaming the Revenue is an established national pastime, that is a pretty good result in the first year of a new tax system.

David Guest is managing director of Transaction Technology, suppliers of Iris, the accounts and tax software system.

Related Articles

Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

Accounting Firms Is inefficiency stealing your time and money?

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
CIMA elects new president

Institutes CIMA elects new president

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

Governance Transparent currency trade: How to achieve costs visibility

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

Accounting Firms Introduction to KPMG UK’s new leadership team

6m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

Accounting Firms EY appoints head of UK Infrastructure Asset Intelligence practice

8m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

Accounting Firms FRP Advisory expands operation with new office, partner appointments

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

Accounting Firms Magma Group announces merger, partner promotions

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

Accounting Firms MHA MacIntyre Hudson advises on management buy-out

10m Emma Smith, Managing Editor