PracticeConsultingControls must stay

Controls must stay

Critics are concerned APB's latest guidance, together with Hampel report, take away auditors and directors' public responsibility to report on companies' internal controls. Phillip Inman reports.

Auditors want to wriggle out of their duties to shareholders and theport, take away auditors and directors’ public responsibility to report on companies’ internal controls. public, critics argued last week, after the publication of guidance for auditors reporting on internal controls.

The guidance, written by the Auditing Practices Board as a consultation document, rejects calls for auditors to give an opinion on the internal controls as part of their statutory audit duties.

It follows the Hampel report which eased the reporting burden on directors and auditors. Hampel overruled statements in the Cadbury report which said directors should comment publicly on the state of internal controls. Instead, Hampel said directors no longer needed to comment on the effectiveness of internal controls, and auditors could transmit any concerns they might have in secret.

Ian Plaistowe, chairman of the board, said it would be wrong for auditors to comment on internal controls based on their audit of the financial statements.

If directors or shareholders want the auditors to express an opinion on internal controls, the document states, they must commission a separate service.

The additional work that auditors would need to carry out, says the report, is onerous.

‘Auditors engaged to report on financial statements,’ concludes the report, ‘therefore have no responsibility to understand and evaluate the system of internal control beyond the level sufficient to plan and develop an effective audit approach unless there is specific statutory, regulatory or additional contractual requirement to the contrary.’

Labour MP Austin Mitchell condemned the document, claiming it was an attempt on the part of the accountancy profession to absolve external auditors from the responsibilities they have to the public and to maintain a strong system of internal controls.

‘It plays down the major role that internal auditors should have in maintaining internal controls and supervising external auditors,’ he said. ‘It endorses the Hampel report that they should report privately on internal controls even though they have a public responsibility,’ he added.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer