TaxPersonal TaxLandmark Han & Yau VAT ruling given

Landmark Han & Yau VAT ruling given

Customs & Excise has lost its appeal in a landmark case that could open the floodgates to challenges in hundreds of past actions.

Last December, the VAT & Duties Tribunal ruled in the Han & Yau case that tax evasion offences should be considered criminal for human rights purposes because of the severity of the penalties imposed.

Customs appealed against the decision, but has had its case thrown out by the Court of Appeal.

Michael Bailey, an indirect tax partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, said: ‘The outcome of this case will lead to a fundamental change in English law.’

According to Bailey the ruling meant that the Customs’ practice of treating tax evasion as a civil offence was in breach of the Human Rights Act.

PwC, who represented the defendants, said anyone charged with tax evasion should have the same protections, such as legal representation, as if they were being tried in a criminal case.

Bailey said: ‘The hallmark of a civilised society is that it provides access to justice for all, and ensures that the due process is fair.’

PwC was represented by its own barrister, Andrew Young in the case – the first barrister from an accountancy firm to appear in a Court of Appeal.

PKF’s John Gwyer called on Customs and the Inland Revenue to get together with the tax profession to find an alternative way forward.

‘If this decision means the civil approach is not going to be viable in the future because the authorities have to go the criminal route, then that’s a retrograde step,’ he said.

But Customs said it was confident the judgement would not impact on the procedures in place for investigating evasion cases.

A spokesperson said: ‘We are disappointed with the result, but think the civil penalty regime is compatible with the Human Rights Act.’

Philip Smith writes:

Customs & Excise carrys out tax investigations under civil law, which allows the defendant to negotiate, admit liability, incur a penalty fine but escape without a criminal record.

The VAT Tribunal, however, ruled that as the fines imposed could be penal in nature, the proceedings should be considered to be criminal in terms of human rights, allowing the defendant the right to silence, legal representation and an interpreter.

Importantly, putting the investigation on the same level as criminal status allows the defendant to avoid self-incrimination.

Links

Human rights force VAT probe rethink

Related Articles

LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

Administration LITRG urges government to consider tax changes in disability work plan

3d Lucy Skoulding, Reporter
HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

Administration HMRC appeal rejected in Tottenham Hotspur case

2w Emma Smith, Managing Editor
HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

Personal Tax HMRC urged to clarify impact of income allowances on Self-Assessments

2m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

Administration New trading allowance: simplicity, but not as we know it

2m Emma Rawson, ATT Technical Officer
Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

Personal Tax Wealthy individuals could circumvent top tax rate rises

4m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

Personal Tax Italy grants first successful non-dom status application to former UK non-dom

4m Emma Smith, Managing Editor
Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

Legal Industry reaction: Taylor Review does not go far enough in addressing tax issues

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

Corporate Tax Does the Taylor Review sufficiently address the gig economy?

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter