UK companies could face legal action if they issue profit warnings or other
statements which are false and misleading, under new plans being brought in by
The proposals give investors a right to sue if they feel they have been
misled when buying or selling shares, and could lead to a slew of litigation
over the timing or nature of company reports.
The proposals, largely in line with a review of the regime by Professor Paul
Davies QC of the London School
of Economics, will give investors a specific right to damages if companies
issue these statements made in addition to periodic statements – on any
recognised information service.
The new rules will permit sellers as well as buyers of securities to recover
Treasury’s first outing of the draft proposals this week, companies were
told that the new proposals will also bring 3,500 more companies within the
regime which previously only applied to main market companies meaning AIM
and Plus market companies face an increased reporting liability risk.
And although auditors and directors have immunity from direct litigation,
companies may still seek to recover money from them if they face payouts.
litigation partner Hardeep Nahal said the proposals are indicative of a new
direction for UK corporate reporting.
‘Corporate reports were not designed as a means of protection for investors
but rather as a way for existing shareholders to monitor management and
This is a shift because it says that investors can sue on periodic and other
reports, on the basis that reports informed their decision to buy shares,’ said
The Treasury’s consultation on the new regime closes on 9 October .
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states
Accountancy watchdog the FRC has dropped its investigation into the former chief financial officer of Tesco, nearly two years after the supermarket was engulfed in an accounting scandal
Colin imagines how Apple's logo might change in the wake of the EC's ruling over its Irish tax arrangements