Solicitors met this week at their annual conference in Paris and were told that employers who force staff to wear suits would be liable to legal action under the Human Rights Act.Barristers from Cloisters, one of the leading UK civil litigation chambers, were warned that the suit and other mandatory dress codes violated freedom of expression and right to privacy.As a result, in years to come, instead of accountants being known for wearing smart suits, the profession may be recognised for bright coloured woollen jumpers or even tank-tops and cardigans. However accountants Neville Russell said allowing staff to a ‘dress down day’ on a Friday was enough.’Due to the nature of accountancy, suits are the most suitable choice of dress and accountancy firms should retain the right to suggest what dress our people wear,’ the firm said.Employee rights experts have warned that once the Act, which incorporates the European Convention on Human Rights into British Law, comes into force next October anybody who doesn’t want to wear a suit will be able to take their case to an employment tribunal.Professions where the employee comes into contact with the public may be exempt from the Act, although people working in closed offices would have a stronger case to wear more casual outfits.
Just one half of UK practices have implemented a pricing structure around auto enrolment implementation and advice - with many suffering increased costs
Deloitte's north-west Europe foray; BDO, Smith & Williamson investment paths; Shelley Stock Hutter; and Wilkins Kennedy discussed by editor Kevin Reed on our Friday Afternoon Live broadcast
Accountants should alter their perspective on auto-enrolment to maximise business opportunities, according to Eric Clapton.
Kevin Reed discusses whether new accountancy group Cogital can rival the Big Four...and its likely direction of travel