HM Revenue & Customs has declined to say whether it intends to challenge
peers’ tax arrangements after it emerged that many were claiming their expenses
more as salary than as itemised expenditure.
The taxman said this week that it would not say what it planned to do on the
issue, on the basis that it would breach taxpayer confidentiality, adding only
to ‘watch this space’.
It emerged this week that peers were claiming a £300 a day allowance as a
routine addition to their salary, rather than as itemised expenditure. Peers do
not have to submit receipts and many claim the full allowance every day they are
But tax rules state that where expenses are not itemised the sum should be
taxed as income.
‘Claims that aren’t supported by receipts generally fall outside the scope of
any tax dispensation (ie. you can’t claim them as untaxed expenses) and if they
are not correctly reported and may result in a stiff fine,’ said David Vine of
Lord Paul was quoted this week saying ‘I spend more money than £300, so I put
in for the amount I can. That’s what I’m allowed to do, and that’s what I do.’
Lord Cope, a former paymaster general, told Accountancy Age this week: ‘I am
quite happy with these arrangements. If the Revenue is happy so am I. I don’t
see a problem.’
Crowe Clark Whitehill , the top 20 accountancy firm, has announced the promotion of Chris Mould to partner
The latest opinions from Accountancy Age on Making Tax Digital, and outline plans to evolve the UK's corporate governance regime
Five million taxpayers are ow using digital personal tax accounts (PTA) as part of the making tax digital strategy, HMRC said
UK-based non-doms have paid ten times more tax than the average taxpayer, raising concerns over the Brexit impact on non-dom contributions and therefore, the economy