PracticeConsultingFRS 12 ‘forces restatement’

FRS 12 'forces restatement'

Senior technical partner says new provisions standard is 'an absolute pain' that will force companies to restate accounts. John Stokdyk reports.

Arthur Andersen technical partner Isobel Sharp this week warned that the new financial reporting standard on provisions would force many companies to change procedures and restate their accounts.

‘Like all good standards, it has its problem areas,’ Sharp told the English ICA’s financial reporting conference in London on Monday. For maintenance and repair provisions, she said, ‘FRS 12 is an absolute pain that undermines a lot of current accounting practice’.

Provisions for repairs and maintenance will not be permitted under the new standard. Instead, they must be treated as ‘accelerated depreciation’, which is creating serious problems for company accounting records, she said.

Under FRS 12 ‘Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets’, published by the Accounting Standards Board last month, a ship that required regular refits would have to be broken down into constituent parts – for example the hull and superstructure and items such as interior fittings that would be renewed more regularly. The different elements would need to be depreciated separately, explained Sharp.

Implementing FRS 12 will have a ‘double-dip’ impact on many companies’ accounts, she added. The standard applies retrospectively, so that non-qualifying provisions from last year’s accounts will have to be written off against this year’s earnings.

In a similar way, FRS 12 could cause problems with the Inland Revenue.

‘Treating certain things as revenue-type items where they are now classified as capital expenditures could make dealing with the tax man very tricky,’ she explained. ‘This is all accounting that should not affect tax, but who knows?’

Sharp also questioned an exemption clause in FRS 12 based on the definition of a ‘constructive obligation’. ‘The first person who uses it may get a one-way ticket to the (Financial Reporting) Review Panel,’ she warned.

ASB member Geoffrey Whittington, professor of financial accounting at Cambridge University, countered that in substance, Sharp’s comments were not deeply critical.

‘If you are going to be innovative, you have to change things – and when you change, you get problems,’ said Whittington. ‘In a way, it’s a tribute that we are changing something.’

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer