Allowing tax arrangements such as those of Arctic Systems would mean
introducing ‘a new form of voluntary joint taxation,’ the taxman has argued on
the first day of the hearing at the Lords.
The case is one of the most contentious of recent years, with the profession
up in arms over the treatment of Geoff and Diana Jones, whose tax setup involved
paying Mr Jones a low salary and taking income as dividends.
Michael Furness, QC, acting for HMRC, told the panel of five law lords:
‘Permitting such arrangements would be tantamount to facilitating, for those
couples whose circumstances allowed them to take advantage of it, a new form of
voluntary joint taxation,’
The Revenue has pursued the case all the way to the Lords, pledging at least
to pay its own costs on the case. Even though it seems to be clearly test case,
HMRC has not pledged to pay the other side’s costs, as is conventional.
‘HMRC is wholly wrong, both morally and in law to penalise small businesses
with a retrospective reinterpretation of tax law,’ said Chris Bryce of the
Professional Contractors’ Group, which has helped fund the case.
‘Geoff and Diana took on the risks and responsibilities of owning and running
Arctic Systems together, and are entitled to share in the rewards together.’
Does Darwin's theory apply to taxation? Colin ponders...
The UK tax gap fell in 2014-15 to its lowest-ever level of 6.5%, revealed official statistics published today
Changes to the tax system is urged to support the growth of entrepreneurs, found a report from the Grant Thornton UK, the Institute of Directors, and the Prelude Group
The EC has been instructed to draft a European Union (EU) directive authorising an EU financial transaction tax, which would apply to ten of the EU’s 28 member states