PracticeConsultingWoolf bites Big Five expert fees

Woolf bites Big Five expert fees

Smaller firms are picking up expert witness work as Woolf reforms eat at fees.

Big Five firms acting as expert witnesses in civil litigation cases could lose work to smaller firms as the downward pressure on fees, caused by the Woolf reforms, is making them increasingly uncompetitive.

The new fears mark a complete reverse from accountancy firms’ expectations prior to the introduction of the changes in April.

Many practitioners then said moves to give courts more control over cases would force small firms out of the market due to cuts in the number of expert witnesses required.

The new powers were designed to cut court time by making litigants produce more information at the start of cases and allow judges to choose a single joint expert in cases where only one opinion was deemed necessary.

Three months on, the reforms have resulted in a cut in the numbers of experts required in smaller cases from two to one, while in many cases courts have chosen firms which offer lower fees, usually outside of the Big Five.

Grant Thornton head of forensic services Philip Kabraji said: ‘In small cases where a single joint expert is being appointed, the court is being swayed. Solicitors are compiling lists of accountants who would do the work along with their charge-out rates and the court often goes for the firm with the lowest rates. That is a real shame.’

He stressed that forcing fees down was not the original idea but repeatedly choosing the cheapest option would have a serious effect.

Though some smaller firms have noticed evidence that charge-out rates have become an issue, they recognise this could potentially mean a greater workload for them as the bigger firms incur greater costs.

Levy Gee head of litigation support services David Epstein said the need for opposing sides to agree on a single expert was also having an effect on fees, as they now had to satisfy two parties rather than just one.

‘Perhaps fees are now more of an issue and that will drive costs downwards. The firms that charge more are automatically going to be at greater risk if litigants are seeking to pay less,’ he said.

Related Articles

5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

Accounting Software 5 tips for SMEs to protect cash flow

5m Alia Shoaib, Reporter
Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

Consulting Tyrie on Finance Bill 2017: ‘Making Tax Policy Better’

11m Stephanie Wix, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Richard Toone, CVR Global

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

Accounting Firms Deloitte 'self-imposes exile' on government contracts to defuse PM row

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

Accounting Firms Managing partner Q&A - the year ahead: Julie Adams, Menzies

12m Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

Business Regulation Friday Afternoon Live: Deloitte's tech thing; PAC wants HMRC 'contingencies'; and Sports Direct

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

Audit Friday Afternoon Live: HMRC complaints rise; Deloitte scoops big audits; and corporate reporting woes

1y Kevin Reed, Writer
New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

Accounting Firms New head of equity capital markets for KPMG

1y Stephanie Wix, Writer