M&S chairman row hots up
Influentional investor organisation casts doubt on M&S' 'rationale' over combined role for Rose
Influentional investor organisation casts doubt on M&S' 'rationale' over combined role for Rose
M&S shareholders are being urged to vote against appointing Sir Stuart
Rose as executive chairman as this would spell ‘a dangerous concentration of
power’.
Pension Investment Research Consultants Ltd, which advises institutional
investors, said making Sir Stuart chairman while he was still chief executive
breached corporate governance best practice.
‘Combining the roles represents a dangerous concentration of power that is
potentially detrimental to board balance, effective debate and board appraisal,’
PIRC wrote in guidance to members.
‘We do not consider the circumstances, nor the company’s rationale, to be
sufficient to warrant the move,’ it added.
The organisation said that, along with a number of clients, it had explored
the possibility of filing a shareholder resolution to address the specific
question of concentration of powers, providing an alternative outlet for
investor concern.
However, M&S claimed that PIRC had missed a deadline unless it was able
to foot the bill for circulating the resolution separately before its AGM on the
9th July.
An M&S spokesman said: ‘We feel we have set out our arguments very
clearly in the past and detailed the checks and balances we would put in place
with our shareholders.’
M&S sent out a
letter
to all shareholders on 3rd April outlining two new board appointments, the
strengthening of Ian Dyson’s role to group finance and operations director and a
revised executive committee membership.